Tag Archives: hathaway

REVIEW: THE DARK CORNER (1946)

I’ve truly been enjoying the discovery of Lucille Ball films that pre-date her more famous comedienne years.  I stumbled upon an early Douglas Sirk melo-noir called Lured that has somehow slipped through the cracks (my review here).  Where that was decidedly dark and broody, The Dark Corner is a classic private detective noir.  It isn’t the fast-talking slapstick of a Thin Man, it is more fast-paced and light than, say, The Big Sleep.  And very well-written.

Private Eye Bradford Galt (Mark Stevens) is being followed by a ghost form his past.  When a hooligan turns up dead, the police look to him for answers.  When they find no other suspects, their attentions turn to Galt — but his witty secretary (Ball) takes his side and helps him find the real killer.

Ball plays her character with a combination of sassy yet vulnerable that other famous noir bombshells didn’t manage to achieve.  Perhaps it was the exacting director, Henry Hathaway, that brought out the best in her, and the rest of the cast, including post-war regular William Bendix.  Hathaway (himself underrated) has a list of noir thrillers that stand out above the genre, including 14 Hours and Niagara.  This film revels in deep-focus photography (see above) making the entire city and its inhabitants a part of the unfolding mystery.  Passersby by are part of the scene, not movement in the background.  These extra layers make The Dark Corner gritty, lively and more realistic.

Posted in film, review | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

REVIEW: THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA (2006)

I finally rented this movie a couple of nights ago. I suppose that makes me behind the wave, but I think perhaps it gave me more perspective than those who raved about its fantastic clothing and fast-paced lifestyle portrayal of the fashion industry.

I found very, very little redeeming in this poorly cobbled-together script. Anne Hathaway plays a young woman who lands a highly coveted internship with a fashion magazine (like Vogue or Elle). This is despite her bookish looks and dowdy clothes. She struggles with the incessant psychic perfectionism her vindictive boss (Meryl Streep) demands, then finally decides, with the help of Stanley Tucci, to give herself a makeover and succeed in her position. Her newfound enthusiasm gains her points at the office but upsets her boyfriend and comrades.

All predictable in its own way but it fails. The friends, in the same scene, are both excited when she brings them swag from work (a $1900 purse, etc) and then they mock her. She gets mad and leaves but she never truly stands up for herself. She doesn’t remind them that the whole point of this internship to gain the experience she needs to land the job of her dreams.

The characters don’t make sense. They have inconsistent moralities. They are upset and react to the wrong things, and skip what they ought to be worried about. Clearly, their lines and actions are only there to move the plot to a pre-determined ending. Tucci is the only one who manages to find a character buried in there and brings it out as best he can.

And all those clothes? There aren’t that many. There is one short scene at a fashion show.
Streep wears nothing particularly stunning. Hathaway’s office-mate looks like a tramp who has been made over by a gang of angry raccoons. As for Hathaway‘s “make-over”, she looks ridiculous, like she has been playing in her mother’s closet. One dress, that she wears for the benefit at the end, finally looks nice. But we are so abandoned by her character that it doesn’t really matter. Her supposed change of heart, too, comes far too late and is half-hearted at best.

It doesn’t achieve satire. It doesn’t present any extremes, good or bad. It just kinda lays there, like a thrown-together ensemble splayed on the bed.

Posted in film, review | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment